In message <9409132142.AA00388@sdrc.com>, Eric Hammond writes:
>Disagreed. (Obviously, or I would not have said what I said.)
Hold it. You're both saying the same thing, yet say say you disagree.
Read his message again.
Jared and you are completely correct. I see absolutely no reason why
Majordomo should enforce a policy which is does not apply to the
system on which it runs.
If "/" in an address is not a problem to the MTA, then it should be
configurable for Majordomo to not complain about the address.
Of course the existence of a password should not override a "hostile"
address. An interesting alternative would be to forward the "hostile"
address (when approved by the list manager) to Owner-Majordomo and
require the the list manager manually add the address in the file.
(via edit, not by e-mail approval)
Replies to majordomo-workers, please.