Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(November 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: feature set?
From: Ray Terry <raymail @ hpwsrt . cup . hp . com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 95 8:46:34 PST
To: cwilson @ slurp . neu . sgi . com
Cc: majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199511061221.NAA05069@slurp.neu.sgi.com>; from "Chan Wilson" at Nov 06, 95 1:21 pm
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85.2.1]

> While we're near the subject, I'm seriously thinking that MJ 2.0
> (whatever *that* means :-) will be a complete rewrite to allow for
> graceful integration of site and list customizations and
> configurations, among other useful items.   I had some late-night
> brainstorming sessions about this, and once I've translated them into
> some coherent thoughts, I'll share them in this forum.   I know others
> have had some thoughts about this as well, so gather those synapses
> together and think about everything that you hate and love and want
> about majordomo.  
> 
> Peace,
> 
> --Chan
> 	(Current maintainer of majordomo)

Chan,

Thanks for your response and for those from all the others (w/one exception).
A quick scan thru the recent archives did not indicate that my comments
had been discussed so I tossed them out.  Didn't mean to step on any toes and
didn't think anyone would attempt to step on mine.

Ray Terry
raymail@hpwsrt.cup.hp.com


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: feature set?
From: Chan Wilson <cwilson@slurp.neu.sgi.com>
Next: another silly question
From: walter@nexchi.com (Walter Torres)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: feature set?
From: Chan Wilson <cwilson@slurp.neu.sgi.com>
Next: Re: feature set?
From: Project Genesis <genesis@j51.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com