Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(December 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: MD 2.0
From: Chan Wilson <cwilson @ slurp . neu . sgi . com>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 1995 10:24:01 +0100
To: terry @ spry . com
Cc: majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Nov 1995 08:57:34 PST." <199511301657.IAA22950@homer.spry.com>

> I'm sure this question has been asked before, but what's the story on 
> Majordomo 2.0?  The 1.93 readme claims that it is an "interim" release while 
> 2.0 is being written.  Is this still true?

Uh, yeah. At least, in spirit.   There's a whole slew of things that
mj needs done to it to make customizing  it much easier, and those
things would make up a 2.0 release.

However, in the meantime, I've been working on consolidating all the
patches and small enhanchments into a 1.94 release that can hold the
tide until 2.0 starts to sprout.

No real definate timeframe, however, just lots of good ideas.  I'll be
(re)gathering the mj 2.0 ideas and putting them up on a web site and
sending out to the list within the month.

--Chan

Indexed By Date Previous: Possible bug in majordomo 1.93
From: Mort (John Harding) <mort@johardi2.async.vt.edu>
Next: Re: Possible bug in majordomo 1.93
From: Dave Barr <barr@math.psu.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Possible bug in majordomo 1.93
From: Chan Wilson <cwilson@slurp.neu.sgi.com>
Next: Re: FYI
From: Ernie Longmire <elongmi@basis.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com