Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(March 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Command to remove an address
From: Brock Rozen <brozen @ netvoyage . net>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 23:07:58 -0800 (PST)
To: Michael Richardson <mcr @ gateway . sandelman . ocunix . on . ca>
Cc: majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <9603250256.AA20075@sandelman.ocunix.on.ca>
Reply-to: brozen @ netvoyage . net

On Sun, 24 Mar 1996, Michael Richardson wrote:

> >>>>> "Brock" == Brock Rozen <brozen@netvoyage.net> writes:
>     Brock> Ideally, it would be nice. But I'm a list-manager for a few
>     Brock> lists on ANOTHER system. I don't believe I would have
>     Brock> access to the global password and then I'm still in a bind.
>     Brock> A compromise to this is having it unsubscribe that user to
>     Brock> any list that has that password. Thus, if you have 5 lists
>     Brock> that have the same password (generally, a bad idea) you
>     Brock> could unsub any user with the above.
>
>   We have PGPdomo now. I think majordomo can make a lot more use of
> signed administrator messages. There is no general certification
> format for PGP, so we invent just what we need and sign it! Okay, the
> interface to PGP is a pain in the butt. I wish i had time to fix that.
>
> <snip>
>
>   The list administrator includes as many of these signed documents as
> needed before the "approve pgp command" which is signed by key
> 0x1E7E6B59. Since they are signed by the majordomo administrator
> majordomo is willing to modify its behaviour and allow the signed
> commands to apply to "all" lists in this key's pervue.
>
>   These are horribly application specific certificates, but I think
> anything else is a more horrible kludge, and this isn't X.509 :-)

Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Let me get this straight.

With PGPdomo I wouldn't have to enter in any passwords, just add my
certificate (how is THAT done?)

Would I be able to have two people use the same certificate? (I'm not the
only one who modifies the lists)

I don't have access to ALL the lists on a particular server, most yes, not
all. Thus, I need to be able to NOT have access to the other lists with
this.


Finally, why would I want PGPdomo? I don't need the extra security that
PGP would provide (it would be nice, but if it takes ANY extra time, I
can't  deal with it; the whole idea here is to save time). If I just had a
script that remove an address I feed it from 13 lists then I would be
fine...

Thanks for your help,

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 | Brock Rozen | brozen@netvoyage.net | http://www.netvoyage.net/~brozen |
 | Check out my Auto-Reply System -- Send me mail with subject SEND HELP |
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Command to remove an address
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@gateway.sandelman.ocunix.on.ca>
Next: Re: Command to remove an address
From: Donald Loughlin <donl@callemx.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Command to remove an address
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@gateway.sandelman.ocunix.on.ca>
Next: Re: Command to remove an address
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@gateway.sandelman.ocunix.on.ca>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com