Majordomo-Workers: Re: subscribe=confirm for majordomo?

Majordomo-Workers
(April 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: subscribe=confirm for majordomo?
From:	Chan Wilson <cwilson @ slurp . neu . sgi . com>
Date:	Sun, 21 Apr 1996 00:12:00 +0200
To:	Dave Barr <barr @ math . psu . edu>
Cc:	majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Tue, 16 Apr 1996 17:21:10 EDT." <199604162121.RAA28071@augusta.math.psu.edu>

> 	Is anyone near to implementing this sort of thing for Majordomo?
> (that is, a subscription request generates a response "send this magic
> cookie back to majordomo@site to subscribe to the list")

<snort>  Looks like *your* message got caught in the administavia
body check at greatcircle, judging by the length of time it sat on
greatcircle.  That's pretty funny. :0)

Yes, the subscribe == confirm is in 1.94.  I'll finish it off tomorrow
and send an announcement where it is.

--Chan

References:

subscribe=confirm for majordomo?
From: Dave Barr <barr@math.psu.edu>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	*Re: any reason restrict_post isn't checked before* taboo?** From: Brent@GreatCircle.COM (Brent Chapman)
Indexed By Date	Next:	A small foo for setting digest volume and issue numbers From: Lindsay Haisley <fmouse@fmp.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	subscribe=confirm for majordomo? From: Dave Barr <barr@math.psu.edu>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Saving administrative e-mail messages From: Daniel R Ehrlich <ehrlich@cse.psu.edu>