Majordomo-Workers: Re: Security Flaw in Majordomo (fwd)

Majordomo-Workers
(April 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Security Flaw in Majordomo (fwd)
From:	Chan Wilson <cwilson @ slurp . neu . sgi . com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Apr 1996 12:04:51 +0200
To:	"Alan Millar" <amillar @ bolis . com>
Cc:	majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:35:49." <m0uCMNW-000Ur2C@hock.bolis.sf-bay.org>

> Do you mean that if "get_access" is set to "list", then list 
> membership will be checked against the list file, the digest file, 
> and/or the files listed in "access_check" (like restrict_post)?

That's the idea.  Mind you, I don't run any digested (burp) lists, but
the code looks correct...

--Chan

References:

Re: Security Flaw in Majordomo (fwd)
From: "Alan Millar" <amillar@bolis.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Config file commentary. From: Chan Wilson <cwilson@slurp.neu.sgi.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Config file commentary. From: "Mr. Erich L. Markert" <1e6244@sunams.usma.edu>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Security Flaw in Majordomo (fwd) From: "Alan Millar" <amillar@bolis.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Security Flaw in Majordomo (fwd) From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>