On Fri, 26 Apr 1996, Mr. Erich L. Markert wrote:
> I have to agree with Chan on this. Somewhere during a product
> upgrade you have to make a logical break from the past. This seems
> to be it. Majordomo Version 1.93 is quite stable. If people don't
> want to use perl 5 let them stay with MJ 1.93.
I would agree with this. Sites which are unwilling to upgrade to Perl 5
might be unwilling as well to upgrade to MJ 2.00. For them, MJ
1.93(4) is quite useful as it is... we could call it "Majordomo Lite"... :-)
Or Majordomo "Classic"... ;-)
> Not migrating to perl 5 will hurt the rest of the MJ users in the
> long run.
I think 2.00 would be a good number to make the jump to Perl 5...
BTW, the Perl 5 included in BSDI 2.1 is 5.001m.
Regards,
Carlos M. Gutierrez
carlos@gutierrez.com http://www.gutierrez.com
References:
|
|
