>>>>> "AK" == Ajay Kochhar <kochhar@ari.net> writes:
AK> Is there any reason that the majordomo server would want to answer a
AK> message of precedence "bulk" or "junk"?
We're going in circles. I asked someone to justify the benefit of doing
just that versus the time it would take to code and test it. Not that it
would take all that long; a simple answer to my question would have
prompted me to produce a patch. Repeating your question does not count as
answering mine.
AK> Likewise, how would it hurt to allow a precedence header to be
AK> configured for messages sent by the majordomo server, say when
AK> delivering messages to the list-owner of a moderated list, or even when
AK> answering a request for "help"?
Who knows? All I said was that I would not code it.
--
Jason L. Tibbitts III - tibbs@uh.edu - 713/743-8684 - 221SR1
System Manager: University of Houston High Performance Computing Center
1994 PC800 "Kuroneko" DoD# 1723
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
