Majordomo-Workers: Re: bug report 1.94b4

Majordomo-Workers
(October 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: bug report 1.94b4
From:	Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Date:	12 Oct 1996 17:16:44 -0500
To:	"Vincent D. Skahan" <vds7789 @ aw101 . iasl . ca . boeing . com>
Cc:	majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	"Vincent D. Skahan"'s message of Thu, 10 Oct 1996 11:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
References:	<199610101811.AA05860@aw102>

>>>>> "VDS" == Vincent D Skahan <vds7789@aw101.iasl.ca.boeing.com> writes:

VDS> I'm still running 1.94b4 (I know...I know) and have a bug report that
VDS> might be worth fixing now.

Actually the problem is that Majordomo's already tossed the address that it
can respond to.  I have this fixed in my working code along with properly
informing the subscriber of several other problems in the supplied address,
but it was decided that this code would be left out of the betas.

 - J<

References:

bug report 1.94b4
From: "Vincent D. Skahan" <vds7789@aw101.iasl.ca.boeing.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: the future of majordomo From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Help with SGI From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	bug report 1.94b4 From: "Vincent D. Skahan" <vds7789@aw101.iasl.ca.boeing.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Unsubscribing (fwd) From: Merrill Cook <mcook@ecunet.org>