>> Someone indicated that they had the majordomo source under CVS - is this
>> "official"?
>
>Yes, but I get the impression you're implying something there... ?
We made some free-standing changes to 1.93 and will be moving to 1.94 soon. This
time I intend to maintain our source in CVS and I'm wondering about the
possibilities of tying in with another CVS source tree ...
I've also been trying to pick out from the general flurry of emails here what
the structure for those who maintain majordomo is (as in who can really feed
mods back into the official source tree, how it happens etc.)
>I simply picked up from where John Roulliard left things, which was in
>a CVS tree. It seems to work, the only difficulty lying in how to
>make it work across disparate networks...
not quite sure what you mean by that last bit ...
Manar
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
