Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(November 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: 1.94 bug: resend -r reply-addr
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 14:20:47 -0600 (CST)
To: Stephen . Campbell @ Dartmouth . EDU
Cc: majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <199611041848.NAA22375@avalon.dartmouth.edu> from "Stephen Campbell" at Nov 4, 96 01:48:10 pm
Reply-to: Dave Wolfe <david_wolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>

[ Stephen Campbell writes: ]
> 
> The resend command is supposed to accept the command-line option
> 
> #       -r <reply-to>           add "Reply-To: <reply-to>" header
> 
> but there is no ":" following the "r" in the call to Getopts:
> 
> &Getopts("CcAa:df:h:I:l:M:p:Rrs") || die("resend: Getopts() failed: $!");

This is true, but the problem is that when some sendmails squash case in
the alias, the -R option becomes the -r option. The real answer is to
not use anything but -l, -h, and maybe -C (thus the 'c') on the alias
command line. Use the 'reply_to' parameter in the list .config file
instead of -r.

-- 
 Dave Wolfe


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: 1.94 bug: multiple Reply-To
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Next: Re: 1.94 bug: multiple Reply-To
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: 1.94 bug: resend -r reply-addr
From: Stephen Campbell <steve@avalon.dartmouth.edu>
Next: Re: 1.94 bug: resend -r reply-addr
From: Stephen Campbell <steve@avalon.dartmouth.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com