Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(November 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: 1.94 bug: resend -r reply-addr
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Date: 04 Nov 1996 17:41:37 -0600
To: majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Dave Wolfe's message of Mon, 04 Nov 1996 14:20:47 -0600 (CST)
References: <199611042020.OAA18566@miaow.risc.sps.mot.com>

>>>>> "DW" == Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com> writes:

DW> The real answer is to not use anything but -l, -h, and maybe -C (thus
DW> the 'c') on the alias command line. Use the 'reply_to' parameter in the
DW> list .config file instead of -r.

Good advice, but oh, the breakage!  How on earth did it ever get determined
that this was the proper solution?  I believe that this change came quite
late in the beta period and was not thoroughly discussed.  I fully
understand the problem that's being solved by it, but there had to be a
better way to do it that silently breaking many aliases.  If it was Chan's
intention to force everyone to change their aliases, a statement of that
fact should have been added to the top of most of the documentation files
and in a separate README.incompatibilities file, or something.  Anything is
better than the current situation,where the change isn't prominently
mentioned (if at all).

 - J<


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: 1.94 bug: resend -r reply-addr
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Next: Re: 1.94 bug: resend -r reply-addr
From: Stephen Campbell <steve@avalon.dartmouth.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: 1.94 bug: resend -r reply-addr
From: Stephen Campbell <steve@avalon.dartmouth.edu>
Next: 1.94 bug: multiple Reply-To
From: Stephen Campbell <steve@avalon.dartmouth.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com