Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(November 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Thought on time-dependent confirmation tokens
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 09:05:52 -0600 (CST)
To: uunet!hpc . uh . edu!tibbs @ uunet . uu . net (Jason L Tibbitts III)
Cc: uunet!greatcircle . com!majordomo-workers @ uunet . uu . net
In-reply-to: <ufau3r584vb.fsf@sina.hpc.uh.edu> from "Jason L Tibbitts III" at Nov 4, 96 11:53:28 pm
Reply-to: Dave Wolfe <david_wolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>

[ Jason L Tibbitts III writes: ]
> 
> The problem: how do you get the date string (i.e. Mon04Nov1996) for
> yesterday?   I would use the DateCalc module, but I suppose you could
> subtract a day's worth of seconds from &localtime and use that in a call to
> &ctime.  Somebody would probably yell about leap seconds, though.

I don't think there are any mainstream OSes that take leap seconds into
account. Resetting the time from a master clock doesn't count, the OS
still doesn't know about leap seconds, it just thinks its clock drifted.
What you propose is the accepted way to compute delta dates.

-- 
 Dave Wolfe


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Digest outgoing alias
From: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@GNS.com.br>
Next: Re: Digest outgoing alias
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Thought on time-dependent confirmation tokens
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Next: Digest outgoing alias
From: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@GNS.com.br>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com