On 6 Nov 1996, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> What would everyone see as the proper solution to this problem? RFC822
> seems to say that multiple Reply-To: headers are illegal, but that the
> Reply-To: can have as many addresses as a user desires, separated by
> commas. (Hey, From: can have the same.) Since under the current framework
> we can't distinguish between the two, the question comes down to whether or
> not we should allow acting on multiple addresses in a From: or reply-To:
> header, and exactly what should happen in this case.
Why not just require the user to use:
subscribe list-name address@whatever.domain
It might bounce if the list isn't auto, but then the list-owner will just
approve it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Brock Rozen | brozen@webdreams.com | http://www.webdreams.com/~brozen |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
