Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(November 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: end of command processing
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 12:16:11 -0600 (CST)
To: bhoule @ microcosm . SanDiegoCA . NCR . COM (Houle Bill at MS Mail)
Cc: majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <32821A4D@pepe.SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM> from "Houle, Bill at MS Mail" at Nov 7, 96 09:37:00 am
Reply-to: Dave Wolfe <david_wolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>

[ Houle, Bill at MS Mail writes: ]
> 
> While I am not generally fond of adding hacks for specific mailers,
> a good compromise for the UUENCODE situation below might be to stop
> processing Majordomo commands if 'N' or more bogus commands are
> encountered. Not sure if it should be 'N' total, or in-a-row. A
> message could be appended instructing users in the proper use of "end"
> in their command blocks.
>
> What's the verdict? (it's not a feature in 1.93; haven't checked 1.94
> yet...)

Just be sure there's a "standard" signature break ('-- ') in column 1
after the Mj commands. Although I suppose a "too many errors" abort
would be nice in some future version too.

-- 
 Dave Wolfe


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Updating MD
From: DALE.SCHNEIDER@dsenter.com (DALE SCHNEIDER)
Next: Re: end of command processing
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: end of command processing
From: "Houle, Bill at MS Mail" <bhoule@microcosm.SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>
Next: Re: end of command processing
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com