Majordomo-Workers: Re: Dealing with multiple Reply-To:s and other message faults

Majordomo-Workers
(November 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Dealing with multiple Reply-To:s and other message faults
From:	Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Date:	07 Nov 1996 11:33:14 -0600
To:	majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	Brock Rozen's message of Thu, 7 Nov 1996 03:31:56 -0500 (EST)
References:	<Pine.OSF.3.95.961107033052.5607I-100000@webdreams.com>

>>>>> "BR" == Brock Rozen <brozen@webdreams.com> writes:

BR> Why not just require the user to use:

BR> subscribe list-name address@whatever.domain

BR> It might bounce if the list isn't auto, but then the list-owner will
BR> just approve it.

You still have to have an address to send the results and confirmation
message (not the token, just the information that the token has been sent
to the other address).  You have to take that from Reply-To:.  That's the
problem.

 - J<

References:

Re: Dealing with multiple Reply-To:s and other message faults
From: Brock Rozen <brozen@webdreams.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Long "auth" lines and short-witted users From: Brock Rozen <brozen@webdreams.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Automatic User Unsubscribe From: Evan Champion <evanc@synapse.net>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Dealing with multiple Reply-To:s and other message faults From: Brock Rozen <brozen@webdreams.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	end of command processing From: "Houle, Bill at MS Mail" <bhoule@microcosm.SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>