Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(November 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: another bug fix to 1.94 majordomo.pl
From: Walt Haas <haas @ xmission . com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 16:18:02 -0700
To: Dave Wolfe <david_wolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>
Cc: majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com, tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Nov 1996 14:55:11 CST." <199611182055.OAA15195@miaow.risc.sps.mot.com>

Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com> wrote:

> [ Walt Haas writes: ]
> > 
> > If the address were:
> > 
> > 	usr/STLIB_SALSA@stlib.state.nm.us
> > 
> > then it would be treated as hostile.
> 
> OK, I see how the 1.93 code breaks now. The test on "/$components[0]"
> should only be done if $components[0] was null from the split. I had
> that coded once and lost sight of why. This should work:

OK, great, but *WHY* are we worrying about trapping this one particular
kind of address?

My patch at least had the virture of not changing line numbers :-)

-- Walt
-------
"Change is necessary.  Change is good."  - Lonnie Burton
"If you don't like those ideas, I got others."  - Marshall McLuhan


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: another bug fix to 1.94 majordomo.pl
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Next: Statistics about the number of times a list is used
From: Sean S Coleman <coleman@boulder.nist.gov>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: another bug fix to 1.94 majordomo.pl
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Next: Re: another bug fix to 1.94 majordomo.pl
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com