Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(December 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: : MAJORDOMO ABORT (fwd)
From: Dave Barr <barr @ math . psu . edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 17:12:05 -0500
To: majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Dec 1996 15:13:01 EST." <32A72CCD.7B0B@harte-lyne.ca>
References: <199612051739.LAA15226@miaow.risc.sps.mot.com> <ufa4ti0vlfa.fsf@sina.hpc.uh.edu> <32A72CCD.7B0B@harte-lyne.ca>

In message <32A72CCD.7B0B@harte-lyne.ca>, "James B. Byrne" writes:
>I'm with Jason on this one.  Internally MJ should use listname-owner
>consistantly but the mailer should be setup to handle owner-listname as
>well.

No!  Why have two?  Why deviate from the standard owner-listname?
(see rfc 1211)

--Dave



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: : MAJORDOMO ABORT (fwd)
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Next: Re: taboo_headers question...
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: : MAJORDOMO ABORT (fwd)
From: "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca>
Next: Re: : MAJORDOMO ABORT (fwd)
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com