Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: More musings on a general access restriction mechanism
From: Brock Rozen <brozen @ webdreams . com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 12:29:25 -0500 (EST)
To: Dave Wolfe <david_wolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>
Cc: majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199701081548.JAA20477@miaow.risc.sps.mot.com>

On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Dave Wolfe wrote:

> > > subscribe : bsps.mot.com : allow
> > > subscribe : bmcu.mot.com : allow
> > > subscribe : aol.com : consult		# superfluous 
> > > subscribe : ALL : consult
> > 
> > >From my understanding, the last subscribe:ALL would negate all previous
> > parameters.  If "commands" are handled in order, then the ALL consult
> > would have to go first.
> 
> No, it's an "or" short-circuit expression, not unlike C or Perl:
> 
> allow(sps.mot.com) || allow(mcu.mot.com) || consult(aol.com) || consult(ALL)

Oh, so if I DID put ALL first, then anything after it wouldn't count.

That works by me also. :)

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 | Brock Rozen | brozen@webdreams.com | http://www.webdreams.com/~brozen | 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 





References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: More musings on a general access restriction mechanism
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Next: Small fix for Makefile
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: More musings on a general access restriction mechanism
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Next: Re: More musings on a general access restriction mechanism
From: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@calder.med.miami.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com