Majordomo-Workers: Re: User unknown shouldn't be getting through

Majordomo-Workers
(February 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: User unknown shouldn't be getting through
From:	Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Date:	02 Feb 1997 15:09:13 -0600
To:	majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	Brock Rozen's message of Sun, 2 Feb 1997 15:28:01 -0500 (EST)
References:	<Pine.OSF.3.95.970202152710.28829E-100000@webdreams.com>

>>>>> "BR" == Brock Rozen <brozen@webdreams.com> writes:

BR> These type of subscribes shouldn't be getting through.

Probably not.

BR> Do we have any type of "valid address" checking in?

That is what the &valid_addr routine in majordomo.pl does.  It doesn't
handle this case, though.

 - J<

Follow-Ups:

Re: User unknown shouldn't be getting through
From: Brock Rozen <brozen@webdreams.com>

References:

User unknown shouldn't be getting through
From: Brock Rozen <brozen@webdreams.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	User unknown shouldn't be getting through From: Brock Rozen <brozen@webdreams.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	subject_prefix without subjects... From: "Edward S. Marshall" <emarshal@common.net>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	User unknown shouldn't be getting through From: Brock Rozen <brozen@webdreams.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: User unknown shouldn't be getting through From: Brock Rozen <brozen@webdreams.com>