Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(July 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Non-ASCII data files in 2.0
From: bill @ ecology . bio . dfo . ca (Bill Silvert)
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 14:30:15 -0300 (ADT)
To: majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com (Majordomo developers)

I was doing some list maintenance and just realised a potential problem 
with version 2.0. According to something that was posted here a while
back (by Jason I think), the lists will be kept in binary format for
faster processing speed. The problem with this is that I find myself
using grep and similar tools a lot to track down bad addresses, and if I
lose that capability it may cost me a lot more time than the use of
binary files will save me.

So two questions (aside from the obvious one of whether I got the story
straight):

(1) Will the ASCII format still be supported? I think that this was
mentioned, but I didn't make a careful note when the message passed by.

(2) Will something equivalent to grep work on the binary files?

Bill

-- 
Bill Silvert, Habitat Ecology Section, Bedford Institute of Oceanography,
P. O. Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CANADA B2Y 4A2, Tel. (902)426-1577


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: where is trial1.patch?
From: Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@ig.co.uk>
Next: Re: Non-ASCII data files in 2.0
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Those darned attachments!
From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Next: Re: Non-ASCII data files in 2.0
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com