|
Majordomo-Workers (August 1997) |
[ Russ Allbery writes: ] > > Okay. In that case, I think the most obvious patch to the current > behavior is: > [deleted] > > This has the advantage of being nigh-minimal impact and should, as far as > I can tell, resolve the security problem entirely. But still diddles the return address, possibly invalidating a perfectly valid address. Be patient. I'm testing a very simple fix that I think has no impact except to remove the vulnerability. -- Dave Wolfe Follow-Ups:
References:
|