>>>>> "BR" == Brock Rozen <brozen@torah.org> writes:
BR> a) Maximum results per command -- it's already in majordomo and
BR> while it may have bugs (I don't know if they're were taken out or not),
BR> does it's job fairly well
What does 'already in majordomo' mean in the context of 2.0? I'm not sure
what you're getting at here.
BR> c) Limit 'which' to zubscribers -- it's in there, but it's
BR> tricky.
If they're already zubscribed, then a simple 'unzubscribe' will remove
them and they don't need to figure out what they're zubscribed as.
BR> d) Limit searches to part of the user's own address -- in other
BR> words, I could only search for 'brozen' or 'torah.org' and nothing
BR> else. Even the latter may be too much, but should be an option.
That's an interesting restriction.
BR> Not at all -- what if I'm on a hidden list? I certainly should have the
BR> right to know what lists I'm on! Of course, if I'm not on the hidden
BR> list, no mention of the search on it should be made in the results.
But then this exposes the names of unadvertized lists.
BR> Yes, I think it does go too far. I think, without a doubt, a user
BR> should be able to find what lists they're on if they enter their
BR> correct e-mail address into the which command -- regardless of mj owner
BR> or list owner settings.
They can always talk to the list owner.
BR> If we wanted to really take care of the problem, we could limit the
BR> results returned to a user in 24 hours and if they go over, notify mj
BR> owner. Of course, they could just use another address. What if we just
BR> quietly sent the request to the mj owner for approval w/o notifying the
BR> user?
That can be done now.
- J<
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
