Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(October 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful?
From: Brock Rozen <brozen @ torah . org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 18:44:12 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Cc: majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <ufayb3w8ag7.fsf@sina.hpc.uh.edu>
Reply-to: Brock Rozen <brozen @ torah . org>

On 14 Oct 1997, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

> NB> Something like 'which @aol.com' needs to be disallowed, too.
> 
> How?  Prevent matches where '@' is the first character?

No, it's useful. Chuq had very good ideas. In this case, do it only if the
user is From: or Reply-To: is that domain. Actually, they could forget
From: and set Reply-To: to it....so if Reply-To: exists, then only that
has to match. If it doesn't, then only From:


   ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
   | Brock Rozen | brozen@torah.org | http://www.torah.org/~brozen | 
   ----------------------------------------------------------------- 




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful?
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Next: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful?
From: Bill Houle <Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful?
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Next: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful?
From: Norbert Bollow <nb@pobox.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com