Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(October 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful?
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Date: 14 Oct 1997 20:01:44 -0500
To: majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Bill Houle's message of Tue, 14 Oct 1997 17:00:47 -0700
References: <3.0.32.19971014170032.009673b0@www.sandiegoca.ncr.com>

>>>>> "BH" == Bill Houle <Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM> writes:

BH> Building on that, what if (for Mj2) "wh*ch" would perform an exact
BH> match search on a properly constructed RFC822 address, with substring
BH> matches bounced to the admin for approval?

This could be done, yes.  It would of course be done through the access
control language, so that the site owner chooses what happens.

The big problem here is that the site owner doesn't currently expect to
have to be approving things, since no approvals are ever sent to
majordomo-owner in 1.9x.

 - J<


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful?
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Next: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful?
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful?
From: Bill Houle <Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>
Next: bouncing with Majordomo
From: Robert Sarao <sarao@pop.tiac.net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com