Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(October 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful? --> moved from -work
From: Norbert Bollow <nb @ pobox . com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 1997 17:42:12 +0200
To: tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu
Cc: majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <ufaen5knxml.fsf@sina.hpc.uh.edu> (message from Jason L TibbittsIII on 17 Oct 1997 11:49:06 -0500)

> PM> Some browsers even support "cookie files" or whatever they may be
> PM> called and handle this authentication procedure completely in the
> PM> background (i.e. without bothering the user at all).
> 
> This I don't get.  If you don't do some part of the process via email
> (since that's the only way to prevent address faking) how can you be
> secure?  You have to bother the user, although you could require them to
> enter their key only once and stuff it in a cookie so they don't have to do
> it again.  (I think; keep in mind that I don't do web things much.)

Yes, this is exactly what I meant, and how I've seen this done... I 
think it's a good procedure, because they need to enter or copy&paste 
their key only once.  It's much easier to get a computer-illiterate 
person to do something correctly once, than to get him or her to do it 
correctly always.

-- Norbert.


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: auto-wrapper in Makefile.PL for Majordomo-0.0199710080
From: "Brian L. Heess - home" <DMbong@krumm.commline.com>
Next: Re: auto-wrapper in Makefile.PL for Majordomo-0.0199710080
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful? --> moved from -work
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Next: Re: Is 'wh*ch' useful? --> moved from -work
From: Bill Houle <Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com