At 9:14 PM -0500 19/10/1997, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>If you say NO, you don't get SetID wrappers. The statement that things
>will be tested is a lie, as I stated in my announcement of this version.
AHHH, sorry then, I totally missed that somehow.
>BLH> So, it looks like your test (that is mentioned above) to see if SETID
>BLH> is needed is not working (and you spelled "and" as "ant" above :).
>
>As I said, it does not exist.
>
>So if you answer the question properly, everything works. Eventually I'll
>write the test function but it isn't quite at the top of my priority list.
You got it. I understand.
Cheers!
-Brian
References:
|
|
