Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(October 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: small typo
From: David Lee <T . D . Lee @ durham . ac . uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 12:26:31 +0100 (BST)
To: Warren Toomey <wkt @ henry . cs . adfa . oz . au>
Cc: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>, majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199710200524.PAA00730@henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>

On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Warren Toomey wrote:

> [JLT had written]:
>
> > No, 'completely' is what I intended (as in 'none processed completely
> > successfully').  Whether or not it's proper diction is for someone other
> > than me to decide.
> 
> 
> How about `None were completely sucessful'?

Diction?  Or grammar?  Presumably the latter.  I believe it should be:
"None was completely successful".  "None" is singular, meaning "not one
(of them)", "not any (of them)"

(Perhaps someone with greater grammatical knowledge could indicate whether
"were" might be correct if the word were (sic) a subjunctive.)

Yours most pedantically!

--

:  David Lee                                I.T. Service          :
:  Systems Programmer                       Computer Centre       :
:                                           University of Durham  :
:  Phone:    +44 191 374 2882 (ddi)         South Road            :
:  Fax:      +44 191 374 7759               Durham                :
:  Internet: T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk           U.K.                  :



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: small typo
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Next: Re: How do I explain aliases?
From: "Jeff Heinen" <jeff.heinen@inherent.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: small typo
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Next: To: address rejection
From: Lindsay Haisley <fmouse@fmp.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com