Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(October 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: To: address rejection
From: Joe Brennan <brennan @ watsun . cc . columbia . edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 97 12:02:29 EDT
Cc: majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 21 Oct 1997 08:35:40 -0400 (EDT)

> > An increasing number of mail servers are taking much needed measures to
> > deal with spam email, and I'm seeing some interesting bounces from the
> > majordomo lists which I administer.  One of the more direct and effective
> > measures is for the mail server to look at the To: address in the header
> > body and reject mail for which the To: address is not local. 

This is too simple to be called "effective".  It makes all BCC'd mail
impossible, and rejects almost all legitimate mailing list mail.
Rejecting a significant amount of wanted messages so as to catch the
spam is irresponsible.

I don't think Majordomo administrators need to accommodate this at all.

Joseph Brennan  Postmaster  Academic Information Systems
                Columbia University in the City of New York
                postmaster@columbia.edu


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: To: address rejection
From: "Merrill Cook" <mcook@pcusa01.ecunet.org>
Next: Majordomo-Docs mailing list archives now available via the web
From: Brent Chapman <Brent@GreatCircle.COM>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: To: address rejection
From: bob@intelenet.net (Bob Myers)
Next: Majordomo-Docs mailing list archives now available via the web
From: Brent Chapman <Brent@GreatCircle.COM>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com