RE: Minimum Length?

["Woodrick, Ed" <ewoodrick @ ed-com . com>]

Title: RE: Minimum Length?

Actually not me, I just couldn't stand not responding with a "Me too!" And it also shows that I suspect most "Me too!" responses would be longer than the original message therefore a minimum post length wouldn't tend to catch most problems.

And signatures in a message would also mess things up.

Ed Woodrick

-----Original Message-----
From:   Roger B.A. Klorese [SMTP:rogerk@QueerNet.ORG]
Sent:   Wednesday, January 14, 1998 10:55 AM
To:     majordomo-workers@GreatCircle.COM
Subject:        Minimum Length?

It's been proposed by my list managers that we could eliminate me-too!
posts by implementing a minimum post length to go along with the maximum.

Would anyone else be interested in this, either in 2.0 (where, to be
honest, I haven't checked if it's already implemented) or as a 1.94.x
patch?
--
ROGER B.A. KLORESE                                rogerk@QueerNet.ORG
2215-R Market Street #576   San Francisco, CA 94114   +1 415 ALL-ARFF
"There is only one real blasphemy: the refusal of joy!" -Paul Rudnick