Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(January 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: another trivial 1.94.4 patch: moderator
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 08:39:56 -0600 (CST)
To: uunet!SanDiegoCA . NCR . COM!Bill . Houle @ uunet . uu . net (Bill Houle)
Cc: uunet!greatcircle . com!majordomo-users @ uunet . uu . net, uunet!greatcircle . com!majordomo-workers @ uunet . uu . net
In-reply-to: <199801172357.PAA26356@honor.greatcircle.com> from "Bill Houle" at Jan 17, 98 04:00:21 pm

[ Bill Houle writes: ]
> 
> ! and restrict_post authorizations. If the moderator address
> ! is not set, it will default to the 'sender' in the config 
> ! file. If 'sender' is not defined, the mail will be sent to
> ! the list-request address (usually the owner).

While this is exactly what the code does, I think it's rather
dangerous given that the -request address is usually set to either the
request-answer script or majordomo with the -l option. Shouldn't it
resort to list-owner instead?

-- 
 Dave Wolfe


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: minor 1.94.4 patches
From: Bill Houle <Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>
Next: Re: another trivial 1.94.4 patch: moderator
From: Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM (Bill Houle)
Indexed By Thread Previous: another trivial 1.94.4 patch: moderator
From: Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM (Bill Houle)
Next: Re: another trivial 1.94.4 patch: moderator
From: Bill.Houle@SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM (Bill Houle)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com