>>>>> "PAR" == Paul Allen Rice <PaulRice@Broadcast.Net> writes:
PAR> Please consider setting the Reply-To: header in a non-delivery
PAR> oriented bounce to point to the original offender. Currently if I
PAR> automate a response to an administrivia bounce, it goes off into
PAR> majordomo land, and not to the sender.
So you're saying that the BOUNCE message that you get should have Reply-To:
pointing to the sender instead of Majordomo? Very doubtful, since you're
supposed to be able to reply to it and do a bit of editing to approve it.
In the future (i.e. works in 2.0 right now), you'll be able to reply and
type "accept" without any editing. Changing Reply-To: would only make this
more difficult. In the future you'll also be able to hit reply and type
"reject" with the luser being automatically informed of the failure, which
might make the whole point moot for you.
Would it help to have the original luser's address somewhere else in the
message? I could probably whip up a quick hack to stick it in an X-header,
but changes are most crappy email clients couldn't see it.
Of course, I could also whip up a quick hack to do what you want now if
you'd like, but I'd never put it in a released version.
- J<
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
