Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(January 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: CLF log patch, take a look please
From: "Brian L. Heess" <dmbong @ commline . com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 12:54:10 -0500 (EST)
To: relph @ sgi . com
Cc: Majordomo Workers <majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to: <9801260939.ZM59279@mando.engr.sgi.com>

On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, John Relph wrote:

> At 10:34 PM 1/25/98 -0500, Brian L. Heess wrote:
> >>The reason I wrote this is that I have been using the same log for about 
> >>40-5 years and for that in reading the log, the dates wrap around at  
> >>the new year... :)
> >
> >PLEASE use a valid UNIX (aka RFC-compliant)  long date format, not this
> >made-up one.
> 
> If we're going to argue date formats, I think the dates should be
> sortable.  In which case, they should always have the format:
> 
> 	YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS
> 
> so that your favorite sort program can sort the log entries.
> 
> But in actuality, I don't really care much, as long as I can tell when
> something happened.

Understood, but the point of my change to the format was to make it
something that is already used, (CLF) that had the year in it.

I am not going to release this patch yet, as I am now working to get the
TZ to be the GMT offset, and hopefully get it ALWAYS there (ie: -0500). 

Cheers!

-Brian



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: CLF log patch, take a look please
From: relph@mando.engr.sgi.com (John Relph)
Next: Re: CLF log patch, take a look please
From: "Randall S. Winchester" <rsw@Glue.umd.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: CLF log patch, take a look please
From: relph@mando.engr.sgi.com (John Relph)
Next: Re: CLF log patch, take a look please
From: "Randall S. Winchester" <rsw@Glue.umd.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com