Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(January 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: CLF log patch, take a look please
From: relph @ mando . engr . sgi . com (John Relph)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 09:39:43 -0800 (PST)
To: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ QueerNet . ORG>, "Brian L. Heess" <dmbong @ commline . com>
Cc: Majordomo Workers <majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG> "Re: CLF log patch, take a look please" (Jan 25, 22:48)
References: <199801260649.WAA02746@queernet.queernet.org>
Reply-to: relph @ sgi . com

On Jan 25, 22:48, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
>
>[ plain text
>  Encoded with "quoted-printable" ] :
At 10:34 PM 1/25/98 -0500, Brian L. Heess wrote:
>>The reason I wrote this is that I have been using the same log for about 
>>40-5 years and for that in reading the log, the dates wrap around at  
>>the new year... :)
>
>PLEASE use a valid UNIX (aka RFC-compliant)  long date format, not this
>made-up one.

If we're going to argue date formats, I think the dates should be
sortable.  In which case, they should always have the format:

	YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS

so that your favorite sort program can sort the log entries.

But in actuality, I don't really care much, as long as I can tell when
something happened.

	-- John

Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: CLF log patch, take a look please
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Next: Re: CLF log patch, take a look please
From: "Brian L. Heess" <dmbong@commline.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: CLF log patch, take a look please
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>
Next: Re: CLF log patch, take a look please
From: "Brian L. Heess" <dmbong@commline.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com