> I have requested it here many times. Until people are actually helping me
> do something, you get what you get. I can't write the software and the
> docs and argue over corner-case RFC grey-area compliance all at the same
> time.
As I said, I'm going to do the Bounce-handler. That is actually the only
reason why I've been reading the RFCs carefully enough to notice those
obscure details related to what you rightly call "corner-case RFC grey-area
compliance".
> NB> If it is possible in any way to trick Majordomo into violating the
> NB> standards, and right now we don't have the resources to fix this
> NB> problem in a reasonable way, we should at least clearly explain the
> NB> problem and potential implications in the BUGS file of the Majordomo
> NB> distribution.
>
> Correction: _I_ don't have the resources to fix the "problem".
>
> You seem to know what you want it to say already, so why not provide a
> patch?
Ok, will do, (at least if I don't forget:). I'll look at the next snapshot
which you put out, assume that any aspect of corner-case RFC compliance
which is not in the snap-shot is something which you'll not have time to
do, and try to document those instances which I'll notice.
-- NB.
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
