Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(February 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Bug in subject_prefix or related code?
From: "Brian L. Heess" <dmbong @ commline . com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 17:29:31 -0500 (EST)
To: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Cc: Majordomo Workers <majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to: <ufad8gk4mmx.fsf@sina.hpc.uh.edu>

On 18 Feb 1998, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

> >>>>> "BLH" == Brian L Heess <dmbong@commline.com> writes:
> 
> BLH> subject_prefix = [$LIST]
> 
> What version of Majordomo?  I'll assume it's not 2.0.

1.94.4  Sorry, I assumed... ;)

> BLH> Subject: [none]
> 
> Searching for "none" in the distribution shows that the digest does this
> when it sees no Subject: header.  (This is required, I think, by
> RFC1153.) 
> 
> But Majordomo itself doesn't add a subject if one does not exist, even
> if a prefix is specified. 

But, logically, shouldn't it if there is a prefix specified?  Add maybe:

Subject: [mantis] none

or even leave out none, but add the [$LIST].

Cheers!

-Brian



Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Majordomo results: mj2 (fwd)
From: Bryan Fullerton <bryanf@home.samurai.com>
Next: Re: Majordomo results: mj2 (fwd)
From: "Brian L. Heess" <dmbong@commline.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Bug in subject_prefix or related code?
From: "Brian L. Heess" <dmbong@commline.com>
Next: Re: Bug in subject_prefix or related code?
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com