Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(February 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Footers and multipart/*
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Date: 20 Feb 1998 10:23:47 -0600
To: majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com

Given the recent (offtopic) question about footers and multipart/alternate,
I wonder about just what is the correct way to attach a footer to weirdly
typed messages.  Right now I take a really naive approach (which is
currently improper, but is just a start) and:

Stick the footer right in the body of a single-part, text/plain body.
  This is what 1.94.x does.
Do _not_ stick the footer onto a single-part, anything else body.
  This prevents the hosing of non-text parts.
Attach the footer as a separate part to a multipart body.

Now I see that the last rule is wrong; it should only be done to
multipart/mixed and not for anything else.

To do anything more would mean turning a single-part message into a
multipart one just for the footer, or would require that I encapsulate a
multipart/* as one part in a multipart/mixed.  These churn my stomach, but
it may come to that when people ask why the footer isn't there in a
multipart/alternate.  (It's not there because they didn't supply it in all
of the alternate forms.  We can't just stick it in the text part and leave
it out of the HTML part.)

 - J<

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Outlook suppressing Subject prefix and Message footer
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Next: Re: (¿ÀÇŸ¿î °øÁö¸ÞÀÏ)¿ÀÇÂÄ«Áö³ë °æÇ° ´ëÀÜÄ¡!
From: "Human & Cyber Inc." <hcbs@hcbs.humancyber.co.kr>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Outlook suppressing Subject prefix and Message footer
From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Next: Re: (¿ÀÇŸ¿î °øÁö¸ÞÀÏ)¿ÀÇÂÄ«Áö³ë °æÇ° ´ëÀÜÄ¡!
From: "Human & Cyber Inc." <hcbs@hcbs.humancyber.co.kr>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com