Majordomo-Workers: Re: Single-command addresses

Majordomo-Workers
(May 1998)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Single-command addresses
From:	Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Date:	05 May 1998 09:53:37 -0500
To:	majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	Norbert Bollow's message of "Tue, 5 May 1998 10:01:42 +0200"
References:	<199805050801.KAA03745@leibniz.math.ethz.ch>

>>>>> "NB" == Norbert Bollow <bollow@math.ethz.ch> writes:

NB> The only way not to loose uniformity between Majordomo 2 sites is to
NB> implement in in vanilla Majordomo 2, _not_ provide an easy way to
NB> switch it off, and implement it in such a way that there is no reason
NB> why anyone would want to hack Majorodomo in such a way as to get rid of
NB> this feature.

Well, you switch it off by not pasting in the alias.  I can't make it
harder than that.

 - J<

Follow-Ups:

Re: Single-command addresses
From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>

References:

Re: Single-command addresses
From: Norbert Bollow <bollow@math.ethz.ch>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	request-answer should not reply to mailer-daemon et al From: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@cs.colorado.edu>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Single-command addresses From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Single-command addresses From: Norbert Bollow <bollow@math.ethz.ch>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Single-command addresses From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>