Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(August 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Zubscribe token...
From: Bruce Campbell <bc @ thehub . com . au>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:02:05 +1000 (EST)
To: Andrew McNamara <andrewm @ connect . com . au>
Cc: majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199808031126.VAA10706@melang.off.connect.com.au>
Organisation: Hub Communications

On Mon, 3 Aug 1998, Andrew McNamara wrote:

> The zubscribe token response says "someone, maybe you, sent this
> request", and suggest how to accept or reject the token. It occurs to
> me that if someone is zubscribing someone else maliciously and
> repeatedly to a list, then the victim may want more than a "reject"
> this token option - a reject-all that lasts, say, 7 days would make
> life easier for these people.

Perhaps the wording of the message should be more along the lines of 'if
you didn't send this, just ignore it or send this to the list
administrator who may stop it happening'.  Emphasise that without their
approval, nothing is going to be changed with their (un)zubscription.

Saves the whole problem of how on earth do you code a 'reject all' token
across all majordomo lists at that site, which may itself be spoofed.

--==--
Bruce.

Systems Administrator (senior?  heck no, just the only ;) )
Hub Communications.



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Stopping spaming modification to Majordomo
From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
Next: Re: Zubscribe token...
From: Andrew McNamara <andrewm@connect.com.au>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Zubscribe token...
From: Brock Rozen <brozen@torah.org>
Next: Re: Zubscribe token...
From: Andrew McNamara <andrewm@connect.com.au>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com