>>>>> "DW" == Dave Wolfe <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
DW> But I thought logmail (the data collection) was quite distinct from
DW> logreport (the pretty formatting).
Oops. Yes, you're right; I'd forgotten how that worked. Plus the archive
indices are already in a form very much like the output of logmail, so it's
only the reporter that needs any real work. (You can probably tell I'm
thinking of nice graphical output here at some point in the future.)
For those who don't know, logmail looks over messages and stores some data
about them in a logfile. Then a reporter goes over the logfile and makes
graphs and lists of top posters and such.