>>>>> "BH" == Bill Houle <bhoule@sparc.sandiegoca.ncr.com> writes:
BH> Not that I think that is a bad idea, but [wc]ouldn't you also make the
BH> Reply-To receiver-defineable?
Hmmm, MUA configuration on the server side. That just strikes me as a bad
idea, but I can't quite put my finger on the reason.
Besides, that would make four combinations, which is just on the brink of
getting out of hand. Perhaps not doing either is the proper action if the
slope is that slippery.
- J<
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
