On 19 Nov 1998, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I still would like to see more testing done. Perhaps the relative silence
> from the folks using it for real work (like the UMD folks) indicates that
> it just works.
I wish that was the case -- although I'm not in a position to dispute it
either way. We're in the process of a server install, but once it's up and
running, you can be sure we'll give it a thorough check-out.
> BR> Besides the "optimization" of digests and RFC1153, what else is wrong
> BR> with it? If that's all, then it seems that digests are usable.
>
> Well, it doesn't actually mail any digests out at all, so they're far from
> usable. It goes through all of the motions of deciding which messages to
> put in a digest but stops there. (Not useful, I know, but I've been
> hammering out the internal changes necessary to make it go fast.)
Oh, I see. Well, digests are something we need -- but certainly testing
the other stuff until digests gets there is something we will do anyhow.
And, of course, I've forgotten all the other stuff that's planned for it
-- like majorcool (web) stuff, as well as bounce processing, etc...
OK -- I get the idea now. :) Basic functionality is essentially there,
it's all the goodies that still need to be installed.
Thanks,
--
----------------------------------
| Brock Rozen | brozen@torah.org |
----------------------------------
References:
|
|
