Majordomo-Workers: Re: Mail sorting facilitation ('feature' addition, rather long)

Majordomo-Workers
(December 1998)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Mail sorting facilitation ('feature' addition, rather long)
From:	Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Date:	08 Dec 1998 21:32:15 -0600
To:	<topping @ digidemic . com>
Cc:	<majordomo-workers @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to:	"Brian Topping"'s message of "Tue, 8 Dec 1998 17:16:55 -0800"
References:	<000701be2311$9c1153b0$0a00a8c0@nexus.digidemic.com>
User-agent:	Gnus/5.070065 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.65) Emacs/20.3

>>>>> "BT" == Brian Topping <topping@digidemic.com> writes:

BT> So I guess what I need to do is start a tirade to standardize the local
BT> argument processing first, then if that were taken care of it might be
BT> easier to reconcile what to do next.

You're way too late for that.  The behavior of the various MTAs just isn't
going to change.  This is a religious issue.

 - J<

References:

RE: Mail sorting facilitation ('feature' addition, rather long)
From: "Brian Topping" <topping@digidemic.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Mail sorting facilitation ('feature' addition, rather long) From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Date	Next:	RE: Mail sorting facilitation ('feature' addition, rather long) From: "Brian Topping" <topping@digidemic.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	RE: Mail sorting facilitation ('feature' addition, rather long) From: "Brian Topping" <topping@digidemic.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Need help on message_footer statements in config file From: "Kelly J. Abfalder" <abfalder@kcnet.com>