I'm totally against this.
Why reinvent the wheel? procmail auto-reply systems will be better than
anything Mj can ever supply, because it's simply not Mj's area.
I just think that Mj does what it does best. Bringing other things in is
"out of it's jurisdiction".
I'd be happy to supply anybody with the code to some really simple
procmail auto-reply systems.
On 9 Jan 1999, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "SP" == Sean Proske <email@example.com> writes:
> SP> how about allowing list owners to set up aautoresponders that can be set
> SP> up and configured by sending email commands?
> How about sending a patch? Or at least doing the design work? This isn't
> a really difficult thing to support, but it would help if someone thought
> out the semantics.
> I'm thinking about a config variable holding the following:
> address1 : response_file
> address2 : another_response_file
> - J<
Brock Rozen firstname.lastname@example.org
Director of Technical Services (410)358-9800
Project Genesis http://www.torah.org/