Majordomo-Workers: Re: DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous)

Majordomo-Workers
(February 1999)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous)
From:	Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ math . uh . edu>
Date:	26 Feb 1999 18:47:32 -0600
To:	Russ Allbery <rra @ stanford . edu>
Cc:	majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM, Brian Grossman <brian @ SoftHome . net>
In-reply-to:	Russ Allbery's message of "26 Feb 1999 16:43:08 -0800"
References:	<19990226064221.8867.qmail@lindy.softhome.net> <ufan221qh7k.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu> <yliucooew3.fsf_-_@windlord.stanford.edu>
User-agent:	Gnus/5.070065 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.65) Emacs/20.3

>>>>> "RA" == Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:

RA> I'm therefore somewhat confused as to the problem being fixed by using
RA> DEFAULT instead and could use some clarification.

Ah, good.  Now someone else is as confused as I am!

I'm going to table this for a bit and work on some other things; hopefully
someone will be able to tell me exactly what to do and I'll go ahead and
slot it in.

I'd wanted to finish this and get it in a snapshot; perhaps tomorrow.

 - J<

References:

Re: mj2 + qmail?
From: Brian Grossman <brian@SoftHome.net>
Re: mj2 + qmail?
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous)
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous) From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: mj2 + qmail? From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous) From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous) From: Brian Grossman <brian@SoftHome.net>