Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(February 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: mj2 + qmail?
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ math . uh . edu>
Date: 26 Feb 1999 18:40:46 -0600
To: Russ Allbery <rra @ stanford . edu>
Cc: majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Russ Allbery's message of "26 Feb 1999 16:37:54 -0800"
References: <19990226064221.8867.qmail@lindy.softhome.net> <ufan221qh7k.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu> <yllnhkof4t.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
User-agent: Gnus/5.070065 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.65) Emacs/20.3

>>>>> "RA" == Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:

RA> The fallback to using DEFAULT if LOCAL isn't defined should
RA> catch pre-1.03 systems with setups not using virtual domains;

Isn't that backwards?  I.e. DEFAULT is the new variable and should be
checked first, falling back to LOCAL?

RA> for virtual domains under pre-1.03 qmail installations, you'd have to
RA> know how many leading portions of the address to strip off, which could
RA> be installation dependent.

I'll provide an option to trim a given string off of the front of LOCAL;
you'll have to hack it yourself, but this should take care of it.

 - J<


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: mj2 + qmail?
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Next: DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous)
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: mj2 + qmail?
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Next: DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous)
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com