Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(February 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous)
From: Brian Grossman <brian @ SoftHome . net>
Organization: SoftHome
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 19:17:58 -0700
To: Russ Allbery <rra @ stanford . edu>
Cc: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ math . uh . edu>, majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Your message of "26 Feb 1999 16:43:08 PST." <yliucooew3.fsf_-_@windlord.stanford.edu>


> My *understanding* is that virtual domains don't rewrite the envelope
> recipient, so if you get mail addressed to majordomo@lists.example.com and
> lists.example.com is a virtual domain pointing to the lists user, you get
> "majordomo" in LOCAL, not "lists-majordomo" which is the user that things
> are actually getting delivered to.  So I *believe* that mjdispatch should
> do the right thing in that environment.
> 
> I'm therefore somewhat confused as to the problem being fixed by using
> DEFAULT instead and could use some clarification.

The virtualdomains control file can cause majordomo@lists.example.com to
get rewritten as lists-majordomo (and users/assign can cause
lists-majordomo to get delivered to the majordomo user).  Better yet, use
virtualdomains control file to rewrite it as majordomo-lists-majordomo.

Brian


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: mj2 + qmail?
From: Brian Grossman <brian@SoftHome.net>
Next: Re: DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous)
From: Brian Grossman <brian@SoftHome.net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous)
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Next: Re: DEFAULT vs. LOCAL for qmail (ignore previous)
From: Brian Grossman <brian@SoftHome.net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com