Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Workers
(March 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Majordomo 2 workers
From: Russ Allbery <rra @ stanford . edu>
Date: 27 Mar 1999 00:12:28 -0800
To: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ math . uh . edu>
To: majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Jason L Tibbitts III's message of "27 Mar 1999 00:33:38 -0600"
References: <Stephen Adkins's message of "Wed, 24 Mar 1999 12:30:14 -0500"> <3.0.5.32.19990324123014.007c0dd0@pop.mindspring.com> <3.0.5.32.19990324154754.007c0dd0@pop.mindspring.com> <v0410481eb3221ea1fd1e@plaidworks.com> <ufa3e2rv3ul.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu>

Jason L Tibbitts <tibbs@math.uh.edu> writes:

> X- headers are by definition not persistent, right?  So they will never
> show up in any replies.  USEFOR and I assume DRUMS were talking about
> explicitly marking headers as persistent, but I don't think that got
> anywhere.  Russ can probably say much more.

Yup.  Got killed at IETF meeting.  (Wouldn't have applied to mail anyway,
but general consensus was that only headers explicitly given that property
by RFC should be persistent and that allowing arbitrary persistent headers
like P-Bob-Sucks: yes or whatever was too open for abuse.)

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)         <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: [Stephen Adkins <spadkins@internetdynamics.com>] Re: Majordomo 2 workers
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Next: Please let's keep commands case insensitive
From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Majordomo 2 workers
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Next: [Stephen Adkins <spadkins@internetdynamics.com>] Re: Majordomo 2 workers
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com