Majordomo-Workers: Re: purge

Majordomo-Workers
(April 1999)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: purge_received = no ??
From:	Dave Wolfe <dwolfe @ risc . sps . mot . com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Apr 1999 10:41:13 -0500
To:	Karl Hanzel <karl @ comet . ucar . edu>, majordomo-workers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<Pine.GSO.4.10.9904261435200.15151-100000@mother.comet.ucar.edu>; from Karl Hanzel on Mon, Apr 26, 1999 at 02:43:23PM -0600
References:	<Pine.GSO.4.10.9904261435200.15151-100000@mother.comet.ucar.edu>

[ Karl Hanzel writes: ]

> The "purge_received" config option is acting as though it's set to "yes",
> even though it is set to "no".  It's not plainly obvious to me staring at
> the perl code why.  Any quick fix?

Hmmmm... works for me on 1.94.4. Are you sure you aren't also specifying
-R on the resend command line?

-- 
 Dave Wolfe

Follow-Ups:

Re: purge_received = no ??
From: Karl Hanzel <karl@comet.ucar.edu>

References:

purge_received = no ??
From: Karl Hanzel <karl@comet.ucar.edu>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Which header gives the "user address"? From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: purge_received = no ?? From: Dave Wolfe <dwolfe@risc.sps.mot.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: purge_received = no ?? From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: purge_received = no ?? From: Karl Hanzel <karl@comet.ucar.edu>