On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Brock Rozen wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 1999 at 15:09, Oliver Xymoron wrote about "Mj2 sendmail...":
>
> > I've seen nothing to convince me that the comma is useful in the context
> > of MJ2. In fact, I was under the impression that MJ2 speaks SMTP and
> > supplies the envelope sender directly, in which case I don't see how it
> > could be an issue. More to the point, it's not an issue in my completely
> > generic setup AND it didn't work with the comma. As an additional
> > datapoint, from the createlist helpfile:
>
> Excuse my ignorance, but would the mj user being listed as a trusted user
> (or not) have anything to do with sendmail accepting the envelope that MJ2
> provides?
I don't think so. If it is talking SMTP, it's on the other side of a
TCP/IP socket and Sendmail only knows it's coming from localhost, not
which user it is. Though I haven't really looked at how MJ2 or the
original bulkmailer code works.
--
"Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."
References:
|
|
